Merge branch 'main' into nrf9151

2 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/docs/pages/faq.adoc b/docs/pages/faq.adoc
index a2f56a539..4ab04e2a1 100644
--- a/docs/pages/faq.adoc
+++ b/docs/pages/faq.adoc
@@ -352,8 +352,13 @@ There are two main ways to handle concurrency in Embassy:
 
 In general, either of these approaches will work. The main differences of these approaches are:
 
-When using **separate tasks**, each task needs its own RAM allocation, so there's a little overhead for each task, so one task that does three things will likely be a little bit smaller than three tasks that do one thing (not a lot, probably a couple dozen bytes). In contrast, with **multiple futures in one task**, you don't need multiple task allocations, and it will generally be easier to share data, or use borrowed resources, inside of a single task.
+When using **separate tasks**, each task needs its own RAM allocation, so there's a little overhead for each task, so one task that does three things will likely be a little bit smaller than three tasks that do one thing (not a lot, probably a couple dozen bytes). In contrast, with **multiple futures in one task**, you don't need multiple task allocations, and it will generally be easier to share data, or use borrowed resources, inside of a single task. 
+An example showcasing some methods for sharing things between tasks link:https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/blob/main/examples/rp/src/bin/sharing.rs[can be found here].
 
 But when it comes to "waking" tasks, for example when a data transfer is complete or a button is pressed, it's faster to wake a dedicated task, because that task does not need to check which future is actually ready. `join` and `select` must check ALL of the futures they are managing to see which one (or which ones) are ready to do more work. This is because all Rust executors (like Embassy or Tokio) only have the ability to wake tasks, not specific futures. This means you will use slightly less CPU time juggling futures when using dedicated tasks.
 
 Practically, there's not a LOT of difference either way - so go with what makes it easier for you and your code first, but there will be some details that are slightly different in each case.
+
+== splitting peripherals resources between tasks
+
+There are two ways to split resources between tasks, either manually assigned or by a convenient macro. See link:https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/blob/main/examples/rp/src/bin/assign_resources.rs[this example]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/docs/pages/sharing_peripherals.adoc b/docs/pages/sharing_peripherals.adoc
index 6bcd56b01..ebd899c4e 100644
--- a/docs/pages/sharing_peripherals.adoc
+++ b/docs/pages/sharing_peripherals.adoc
@@ -126,3 +126,5 @@ async fn toggle_led(control: Sender<'static, ThreadModeRawMutex, LedState, 64>,
 
 This example replaces the Mutex with a Channel, and uses another task (the main loop) to drive the LED. The advantage of this approach is that only a single task references the peripheral, separating concerns. However, using a Mutex has a lower overhead and might be necessary if you need to ensure
 that the operation is completed before continuing to do other work in your task.
+
+An example showcasing more methods for sharing link:https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/blob/main/examples/rp/src/bin/sharing.rs[can be found here].
\ No newline at end of file